Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Mike Frysinger <vapier@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Changing order of default virtual/udev provider
Date: Wed, 10 Feb 2016 05:10:15
Message-Id: 20160210050958.GV7732@vapier.lan
In Reply to: [gentoo-dev] Re: Changing order of default virtual/udev provider by Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@cox.net>
1 On 09 Feb 2016 22:39, Duncan wrote:
2 > Mike Frysinger posted on Tue, 09 Feb 2016 14:26:52 -0500 as excerpted:
3 > > On 08 Feb 2016 13:46, Michał Górny wrote:
4 > >> I'm strongly against this, because:
5 > >
6 > > agreed. i also don't see any reasons in Patrick's e-mail to suggest the
7 > > current default is inadequate. "i don't like upstream" isn't relevant.
8 >
9 > I'd agree, except that the way we're running udev is strongly discouraged
10 > and generally not supported by upstream, with a statement that it /will/
11 > break in the future, it's simply a matter of time.
12
13 start a thread then when that actually happens
14 -mike

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Changing order of default virtual/udev provider waltdnes@××××××××.org