Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Jakub Moc <jakub@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Monthly Gentoo Council Reminder for August
Date: Thu, 03 Aug 2006 14:10:15
Message-Id: 44D20317.6030000@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Monthly Gentoo Council Reminder for August by Ned Ludd
1 Ned Ludd wrote:
2 > On Thu, 2006-08-03 at 08:06 -0500, Lance Albertson wrote:
3 >>>> Would like the Council to discuss the current state of Gentoo Bugzilla
4 >>>> [1] and anon CVS/SVN [2].
5 >>> Please elaborate why you need the council to discuss
6 >>> ongoing active bugs that are in progress.
7
8 Progress? Erm... see below.
9
10 >> I would also like to know why the council has to be involved since
11 >> you've never sent an email to infra specifically asking the same thing
12 >> first. Sure makes sense to me that you should ask the group involved
13 >> with the work first instead of going to the top.
14
15 Because it's been broken for ages? Because I've asked the same on the
16 bug I've referred to multiple times, as did quite a few other people,
17 and the thing is still dead ~3 hours a day? (So uhm, the argument that
18 infra doesn't know about is _really_ moot.) Because users complain over
19 and over again? Because we are getting tons of duplicate bugs due to
20 bugzilla being non-responsive? Because it's wasting hours of my time
21 every day? Because if CVS was in the same state, you'd about have a
22 revolution by now?
23
24 >> The anoncvs/svn stuff needs the attention of some knowledgeable cvs/svn
25 >> guru. We want to ensure that we cover all our grounds in the setup so
26 >> that we don't make a system that's easily DoS'able. If anyone wants to
27 >> help out with that, please contact KingTaco as he's the contact for that
28 >> project right now.
29 >
30 > It's just about ready afaik. We just want robbat2 to review the CVS
31 > setup and I probably need to drop a patch in the cvs pkg to disable
32 > compression. We probably also want Pylon to review the svn setup.
33
34 Good news, would be nice if you actually responded on the bug maybe? Or
35 send out some status report occasionally, since the bug's been open for
36 ~1 year now?
37
38 >> Patience is indeed a virtue.
39 >
40 > Indeed..
41
42 Sorry, having a critical facility broken for ~6 months right now =!
43 patience. It plain sucks.
44
45
46 --
47 Best regards,
48
49 Jakub Moc
50 mailto:jakub@g.o
51 GPG signature:
52 http://subkeys.pgp.net:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xCEBA3D9E
53 Primary key fingerprint: D2D7 933C 9BA1 C95B 2C95 B30F 8717 D5FD CEBA 3D9E
54
55 ... still no signature ;)

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature

Replies