1 |
On Thu, 2006-08-03 at 16:07 +0200, Jakub Moc wrote: |
2 |
> Ned Ludd wrote: |
3 |
> > On Thu, 2006-08-03 at 08:06 -0500, Lance Albertson wrote: |
4 |
> >>>> Would like the Council to discuss the current state of Gentoo Bugzilla |
5 |
> >>>> [1] and anon CVS/SVN [2]. |
6 |
> >>> Please elaborate why you need the council to discuss |
7 |
> >>> ongoing active bugs that are in progress. |
8 |
> |
9 |
> Progress? Erm... see below. |
10 |
> |
11 |
> >> I would also like to know why the council has to be involved since |
12 |
> >> you've never sent an email to infra specifically asking the same thing |
13 |
> >> first. Sure makes sense to me that you should ask the group involved |
14 |
> >> with the work first instead of going to the top. |
15 |
> |
16 |
> Because it's been broken for ages? Because I've asked the same on the |
17 |
> bug I've referred to multiple times, as did quite a few other people, |
18 |
> and the thing is still dead ~3 hours a day? (So uhm, the argument that |
19 |
> infra doesn't know about is _really_ moot.) Because users complain over |
20 |
> and over again? Because we are getting tons of duplicate bugs due to |
21 |
> bugzilla being non-responsive? |
22 |
|
23 |
Ok this is basically bitching. Trust me we all know the current state |
24 |
of things with bugzilla and it's not fun for anybody. I'm sure |
25 |
however if you practice a little patience I'm sure you will be |
26 |
quite pleased with the end result. |
27 |
|
28 |
> Because it's wasting hours of my time |
29 |
> every day? Because if CVS was in the same state, you'd about have a |
30 |
> revolution by now? |
31 |
|
32 |
I think you might be misunderstanding the role that the council plays. |
33 |
It's a body for technical matters that effect the mainly "the code". |
34 |
Daily matters of infrastructure are handled by our infra team naturally. |
35 |
Funding for hardware is approved by the foundation. |
36 |
|
37 |
> >> The anoncvs/svn stuff needs the attention of some knowledgeable cvs/svn |
38 |
> >> guru. We want to ensure that we cover all our grounds in the setup so |
39 |
> >> that we don't make a system that's easily DoS'able. If anyone wants to |
40 |
> >> help out with that, please contact KingTaco as he's the contact for that |
41 |
> >> project right now. |
42 |
> > |
43 |
> > It's just about ready afaik. We just want robbat2 to review the CVS |
44 |
> > setup and I probably need to drop a patch in the cvs pkg to disable |
45 |
> > compression. We probably also want Pylon to review the svn setup. |
46 |
> |
47 |
> Good news, would be nice if you actually responded on the bug maybe? Or |
48 |
> send out some status report occasionally, since the bug's been open for |
49 |
> ~1 year now? |
50 |
> |
51 |
> >> Patience is indeed a virtue. |
52 |
> > |
53 |
> > Indeed.. |
54 |
> |
55 |
> Sorry, having a critical facility broken for ~6 months right now =! |
56 |
> patience. It plain sucks. |
57 |
|
58 |
You must live in that town where spare hardware and administrators |
59 |
grow on the trees. |
60 |
|
61 |
As it stands I do not see why this needs to be an agenda item for |
62 |
council discussions. |
63 |
|
64 |
-- |
65 |
Ned Ludd <solar@g.o> |
66 |
Gentoo Linux |
67 |
|
68 |
-- |
69 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |