| 1 |
Ned Ludd wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Thu, 2006-08-03 at 16:07 +0200, Jakub Moc wrote: |
| 3 |
>> Because it's been broken for ages? Because I've asked the same on the |
| 4 |
>> bug I've referred to multiple times, as did quite a few other people, |
| 5 |
>> and the thing is still dead ~3 hours a day? (So uhm, the argument that |
| 6 |
>> infra doesn't know about is _really_ moot.) Because users complain over |
| 7 |
>> and over again? Because we are getting tons of duplicate bugs due to |
| 8 |
>> bugzilla being non-responsive? |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
> Ok this is basically bitching. Trust me we all know the current state |
| 11 |
> of things with bugzilla and it's not fun for anybody. I'm sure |
| 12 |
> however if you practice a little patience I'm sure you will be |
| 13 |
> quite pleased with the end result. |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
A little patience? As in half year is not enough? |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
>> Because it's wasting hours of my time |
| 18 |
>> every day? Because if CVS was in the same state, you'd about have a |
| 19 |
>> revolution by now? |
| 20 |
> |
| 21 |
> I think you might be misunderstanding the role that the council plays. |
| 22 |
> It's a body for technical matters that effect the mainly "the code". |
| 23 |
> Daily matters of infrastructure are handled by our infra team naturally. |
| 24 |
> Funding for hardware is approved by the foundation. |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
Well, I think council should care about things that affect Gentoo as a |
| 27 |
whole, and apparently that's not just me: |
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/council/ |
| 30 |
|
| 31 |
<snip> |
| 32 |
The elected Gentoo Council decides on global issues and policies that |
| 33 |
affect multiple projects in Gentoo. |
| 34 |
</snip> |
| 35 |
|
| 36 |
Broken bugzilla affects every ebuild dev, affects GDP, affects bug |
| 37 |
wranglers, affects anyone else who's using it to track outstanding |
| 38 |
project issues. How is this continuous borkage not a global issue that |
| 39 |
council should discuss? |
| 40 |
|
| 41 |
> You must live in that town where spare hardware and administrators |
| 42 |
> grow on the trees. |
| 43 |
|
| 44 |
No, not really. Just that I'd expect kinda more proactive approach than |
| 45 |
the one demonstrated fex. in |
| 46 |
http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=128588#c29 (and a bit more |
| 47 |
flexible approach to other alternatives, such as HW/hosting offers we've |
| 48 |
received before) and that have been declined for various strange reasons. |
| 49 |
|
| 50 |
|
| 51 |
-- |
| 52 |
Best regards, |
| 53 |
|
| 54 |
Jakub Moc |
| 55 |
mailto:jakub@g.o |
| 56 |
GPG signature: |
| 57 |
http://subkeys.pgp.net:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xCEBA3D9E |
| 58 |
Primary key fingerprint: D2D7 933C 9BA1 C95B 2C95 B30F 8717 D5FD CEBA 3D9E |
| 59 |
|
| 60 |
... still no signature ;) |
Archives