1 |
On Mon, 20 Nov 2017 10:26:29 +0100 |
2 |
David Seifert <soap@g.o> wrote: |
3 |
|
4 |
> Round 2 (with correct whitespace this time): |
5 |
> |
6 |
> Title: No stable KEYWORDS for Gentoo Games |
7 |
> Author: David Seifert <soap@g.o> |
8 |
> Content-Type: text/plain |
9 |
> Posted: 2017-11-20 |
10 |
> Revision: 1 |
11 |
> News-Item-Format: 1.0 |
12 |
> Display-If-Keyword: amd64 x86 |
13 |
> |
14 |
> As the Games team does not have enough manpower to keep tabs on all |
15 |
> games packages, we have dropped all ebuilds maintained by the games |
16 |
> project to unstable KEYWORDS (without those required by other stable |
17 |
> packages). If you have any of these stable games packages installed, |
18 |
> you will have to add them to /etc/portage/package.accept_keywords/ |
19 |
> manually. Failures related to missing stable KEYWORDS will show up as |
20 |
> |
21 |
> The following keyword changes are necessary to proceed: |
22 |
> (see "package.accept_keywords" in the portage(5) man page for more |
23 |
> details) |
24 |
> # required by @selected |
25 |
> # required by @world (argument) |
26 |
> =games-action/0verkill-0.16-r4 ~amd64 |
27 |
> |
28 |
> While we accept that this will cause some irritation for the |
29 |
> community, pretending we have a well supported games collection by |
30 |
> having a wealth of stable games packages is misleading at best. We |
31 |
> welcome contributions from outsiders willing to polish up the games |
32 |
> landscape in Gentoo via the Proxy Maintainers. |
33 |
|
34 |
What does it mean for the future? Should not users bother to test & |
35 |
write stabilization request bugs for games anymore? Or stabi |
36 |
requests will still be accepted? |
37 |
|
38 |
Robert |
39 |
|
40 |
|
41 |
-- |
42 |
Róbert Čerňanský |
43 |
E-mail: openhs@×××××××××.com |
44 |
Jabber: hs@××××××.sk |