1 |
Am Freitag, 15. Dezember 2017, 23:37:48 CET schrieb R0b0t1: |
2 |
> Hello, |
3 |
> |
4 |
> On Tue, Dec 5, 2017 at 4:18 PM, Nils Freydank <holgersson@××××××.de> wrote: |
5 |
> > Hello everyone, |
6 |
> > |
7 |
> > with regards to the current mailing list (ML) split discussion, and one |
8 |
> > specific message deep down there by mgorny asked for someone providing |
9 |
> > moderator rules, I would like to propose the following ruleset for |
10 |
> > gentoo-dev |
11 |
> > |
12 |
> > Right now the situation escalated in a way that forces to actually do |
13 |
> > something and I hope we can recreate an atmosphere where technical |
14 |
> > improvements can happen. |
15 |
> |
16 |
> To me, at least, this isn't self-evident. What specific actions make |
17 |
> you think an immediate response is necessary? |
18 |
> |
19 |
> self-evident |
20 |
> adj. Evident to one’s self and to nobody else. |
21 |
> |
22 |
> Cheers, |
23 |
> R0b0t1 |
24 |
There is a specific RFC about splitting the mailing list because of a |
25 |
problematic style of conversation. |
26 |
|
27 |
Even if that split won’t happen -- I don’t know if mgorny has the "right" or |
28 |
support to do that and I personally want to stay out of these discussions -- I |
29 |
really *do* think that a moderation of a frequented mailing list like gentoo- |
30 |
dev is a generally good idea. Therefore we need properly documented rules |
31 |
(beside moderators). |
32 |
|
33 |
To answer you question: I think the RFC introduces either a "time pressure" or |
34 |
should be seen as sign that this list needs an improvement. |
35 |
|
36 |
Regards, |
37 |
Nils |
38 |
|
39 |
-- |
40 |
GPG fingerprint: '766B 8122 1342 6912 3401 492A 8B54 D7A3 FF3C DB17' |
41 |
Holgersson |