Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Stuart Herbert <stuart.herbert@×××××.com>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo 2006.1
Date: Sun, 03 Sep 2006 16:47:03
Message-Id: b38c6f4c0609030940o447eb77cqead21a6fd0e96950@mail.gmail.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo 2006.1 by Alec Warner
1 On 9/3/06, Alec Warner <antarus@g.o> wrote:
2 > in the end
3 > GCC-4.1 going stable is up to releng and arch teams (heck it doesn't
4 > technically have to go stable on all arches). So who "screwed up" in
5 > this case?
6
7 Well, for a package like PHP, the package maintainers take
8 responsibility for ensuring that there are useful and adequate
9 announcements up front.
10
11 GCC I suspect is surrounded by more confusion. Either the package
12 maintainers or the arch teams could have made an announcement giving
13 fair warning; alas, neither did.
14
15 Best regards,
16 Stu
17 --
18 gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo 2006.1 Chris Gianelloni <wolf31o2@g.o>
[gentoo-dev] Re: Gentoo 2006.1 Ryan Hill <dirtyepic.sk@×××××.com>