| 1 |
Stuart Herbert wrote: |
| 2 |
> On 9/3/06, Alec Warner <antarus@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 |
>> And no one has implemented any kind of solution. |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
> You need someone to implement a solution? Surely what we need is for |
| 6 |
> folks to actually make an announcement in the first place? |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
> I asked for what has become GLEP 42 because we do have a problem |
| 9 |
> reaching folks with announcements. But you know what? GLEP 42 |
| 10 |
> wouldn't help in cases like this, where there's either no announcement |
| 11 |
> at all, or the announcement comes at the last minute. |
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
> Technology is just a tool. A technical solution needs something fed |
| 14 |
> into it. |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
I never specified that the solution had to be technical in nature ;) |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
We have the Gentoo Status project, but it's been rather dead lately. We |
| 19 |
have PR, but they are more concerned with the release; in the end |
| 20 |
GCC-4.1 going stable is up to releng and arch teams (heck it doesn't |
| 21 |
technically have to go stable on all arches). So who "screwed up" in |
| 22 |
this case? |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
> |
| 25 |
> Best regards, |
| 26 |
> Stu |
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
-- |
| 29 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives