| 1 |
On Wed, 11 Jun 2008 07:46:39 +0200 |
| 2 |
Luca Barbato <lu_zero@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 |
> Ciaran McCreesh wrote: |
| 4 |
> > On Tue, 10 Jun 2008 22:33:41 -0700 |
| 5 |
> > Brian Harring <ferringb@×××××.com> wrote: |
| 6 |
> >> Lay out how .006/.6 would work properly *per* eapi. As I clarified |
| 7 |
> >> in my last email, the master would vary dependant on the eapi- |
| 8 |
> >> which isn't valid unless you're retroactively overriding the |
| 9 |
> >> versioning rules of an eapi. |
| 10 |
> > |
| 11 |
> > "Must be a superset" being wrong does not mean "entirely arbitrary |
| 12 |
> > changes are OK" is right. |
| 13 |
> |
| 14 |
> You have actual usecases (eventually not thin air), which is your |
| 15 |
> counterproposal that works for them? |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
Care to rephrase that in English? I'm not proposing anything, so I'm at |
| 18 |
a loss as to what you're going on about here. |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
-- |
| 21 |
Ciaran McCreesh |
Archives