Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Luca Barbato <lu_zero@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] extending existing EAPI semantics
Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2008 05:47:29
Message-Id: 484F66BF.2040002@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] extending existing EAPI semantics by Ciaran McCreesh
1 Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
2 > On Tue, 10 Jun 2008 22:33:41 -0700
3 > Brian Harring <ferringb@×××××.com> wrote:
4 >> Lay out how .006/.6 would work properly *per* eapi. As I clarified
5 >> in my last email, the master would vary dependant on the eapi- which
6 >> isn't valid unless you're retroactively overriding the versioning
7 >> rules of an eapi.
8 >
9 > "Must be a superset" being wrong does not mean "entirely arbitrary
10 > changes are OK" is right.
11
12 You have actual usecases (eventually not thin air), which is your
13 counterproposal that works for them?
14
15 lu
16
17 --
18
19 Luca Barbato
20 Gentoo Council Member
21 Gentoo/linux Gentoo/PPC
22 http://dev.gentoo.org/~lu_zero
23
24 --
25 gentoo-dev@l.g.o mailing list

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] extending existing EAPI semantics Ciaran McCreesh <ciaran.mccreesh@××××××××××.com>