Archives
Archives
| From: | Ciaran McCreesh <ciaran.mccreesh@××××××××××.com> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] extending existing EAPI semantics | ||
| Date: | Wed, 11 Jun 2008 05:37:39 | ||
| Message-Id: | 20080611063722.6092077b@googlemail.com | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] extending existing EAPI semantics by Brian Harring |
||
| 1 | On Tue, 10 Jun 2008 22:33:41 -0700 |
| 2 | Brian Harring <ferringb@×××××.com> wrote: |
| 3 | > Lay out how .006/.6 would work properly *per* eapi. As I clarified |
| 4 | > in my last email, the master would vary dependant on the eapi- which |
| 5 | > isn't valid unless you're retroactively overriding the versioning |
| 6 | > rules of an eapi. |
| 7 | |
| 8 | "Must be a superset" being wrong does not mean "entirely arbitrary |
| 9 | changes are OK" is right. |
| 10 | |
| 11 | -- |
| 12 | Ciaran McCreesh |
| File name | MIME type |
|---|---|
| signature.asc | application/pgp-signature |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-dev] extending existing EAPI semantics | Luca Barbato <lu_zero@g.o> |