1 |
On Sun, Nov 18, 2012 at 11:14 AM, Rafael Goncalves Martins |
2 |
<rafaelmartins@g.o> wrote: |
3 |
> If these organizations aren't governed by Gentoo they should have some |
4 |
> disclaimers, saying that the projects hosted there aren't sponsored by |
5 |
> Gentoo, but this udev-ng/eudev/whatever thing does the opposite and |
6 |
> actually advertise the Gentoo sponsorship with the sentence "This is a |
7 |
> Gentoo sponsored project and testing is currently being done with |
8 |
> openrc." in their README |
9 |
> |
10 |
> I don't think that someone can claim this sponsorship without a council vote. |
11 |
> |
12 |
|
13 |
Read GLEP 39. Any dev can create a project. Granted, most Gentoo |
14 |
projects don't follow the GLEP to the letter, and as long as nothing |
15 |
goes wrong it isn't a big problem. The council can step in if |
16 |
necessary, but having some source out on github won't kill anybody. |
17 |
|
18 |
Keep in mind though that using github exclusively isn't exactly |
19 |
aligned with the social contract - I would encourage having the |
20 |
sources on Gentoo servers. That said, I don't think it matters where |
21 |
people do the work vs what is the mirror - just nobody should be |
22 |
forced to use github (proprietary) to contribute. |
23 |
|
24 |
As long as everybody behaves Gentoo devs can work on whatever they |
25 |
want to. None of us are paid to do this. |
26 |
|
27 |
If a bunch of strangers made the same claim I'd be more concerned. |
28 |
|
29 |
If anybody feels a Gentoo project is out of line feel free to submit a |
30 |
bug to the Council or Trustees as appropriate. However, please save |
31 |
that for things like "they're breaking the law" or "they refuse to |
32 |
have elections for a lead" or whatever, and not "I don't like what |
33 |
they're working on." The recourse for the latter is to adjust your |
34 |
profile/USE-flags/killfile as appropriate. |
35 |
|
36 |
Rich |