Archives
Archives
| From: | Rich Freeman <rich0@g.o> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-dev <gentoo-dev@l.g.o> | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Uncoordinated changes | ||
| Date: | Sun, 14 Feb 2016 01:16:14 | ||
| Message-Id: | CAGfcS_nxVEcYWS9cef82s4DpcCQu8KvMkaBP+skSvk7+BqcY+g@mail.gmail.com | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Uncoordinated changes by Raymond Jennings |
||
| 1 | On Sat, Feb 13, 2016 at 7:58 PM, Raymond Jennings <shentino@×××××.com> wrote: |
| 2 | > So what do you guys think of leaving behind empty stubs for compatibility |
| 3 | > and then simply filing a tracking bug blocked by any packages that removing |
| 4 | > herds broke? |
| 5 | |
| 6 | It isn't entirely clear that anything is actually broken at the |
| 7 | moment, but if distributing an empty herds.xml file makes somebody's |
| 8 | life easier I have no objections. I don't think it would have |
| 9 | alleviated Patrick's original concerns in this case. |
| 10 | |
| 11 | -- |
| 12 | Rich |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Uncoordinated changes | Raymond Jennings <shentino@×××××.com> |
| [gentoo-dev] herds.xml removal (was: Re: Uncoordinated changes) | Ulrich Mueller <ulm@g.o> |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Uncoordinated changes | Patrick Lauer <patrick@g.o> |