1 |
On 01/10/2018 05:57 AM, David Seifert wrote: |
2 |
> On Wed, 2018-01-10 at 08:55 +0100, Lars Wendler wrote: |
3 |
>> On Wed, 10 Jan 2018 08:48:56 +0300 Eray Aslan wrote: |
4 |
>> |
5 |
>>> On Tue, Jan 09, 2018 at 10:20:56PM +0100, Andreas K. Huettel wrote: |
6 |
>>>> * Posting to the list will only be possible to Gentoo developers |
7 |
>>>> and |
8 |
>>>> whitelisted additional participants. |
9 |
>>> This is so contrary to what I and I thought Gentoo stands for: |
10 |
>>> openness, transparency, inclusiveness even when these require a |
11 |
>>> rather |
12 |
>>> thick skin and result in high noise. It's a price worth paying. |
13 |
>>> |
14 |
>>> I guess I should a) pay more attention to council elections b) |
15 |
>>> consider |
16 |
>>> the idea that the whole council thing as it stands now is just not |
17 |
>>> working. |
18 |
>>> |
19 |
>> Wow. I couldn't have said it better. |
20 |
>> Seems we're turning into an elitist club or something... |
21 |
>> I wonder how many users we're going to loose on this one. Well done |
22 |
>> council :-( |
23 |
>> |
24 |
> If your only reason to use Gentoo is because you can post to the main |
25 |
> developer ML, and not because we try to provide a great distribution |
26 |
> with lots of choice, a current toolchain and lots of customization, |
27 |
> then you're likely using the wrong distribution. |
28 |
> |
29 |
|
30 |
If development of a quality distribution which meets |
31 |
these goals requires thick skin, something is broken: |
32 |
|
33 |
I've never seen anything from the gentoo foundation |
34 |
which suggests that the gentoo developer mail list |
35 |
should be considered a safe space for disparaging |
36 |
remarks. Think of the messaging on this - for every |
37 |
1 or 2 people who are willing to come forward to |
38 |
address these concerns, there are likely "not zero" |
39 |
who didn't want to deal with confrontation and the |
40 |
risk that rudeness and hostile behavior would be |
41 |
defended. |