Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Danny van Dyk <kugelfang@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Decision to remove stage1/2 from installation documentation
Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2005 18:15:21
Message-Id: 43835FD0.7020209@gentoo.org
In Reply to: [gentoo-dev] Re: Decision to remove stage1/2 from installation documentation by Thomas Kirchner
1 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
2 Hash: SHA1
3
4 Thomas Kirchner schrieb:
5 | I'm against this change, personally. Stage1 has *always* been for
6 | advanced users. If someone screws up their own system (which is possible
7 | in any number of other ways, as well) then it's their fault. Gentoo
8 | isn't about babying users. It is about choice. And if changing that is
9 | the only way to reduce your workload, well...
10
11 In which way do we take away your ability to choose by moving
12 documentation from one place to another one? It's just the aim to not
13 include this documentation into the handbook (which ends up on the
14 installcds) and to move it out of the scope of ricers.
15
16 Advanced won't need that documentation anyway, as they don't qualify as
17 adcaneced if they do! (At least in my eyes)
18
19 Danny
20 - --
21 Danny van Dyk <kugelfang@g.o>
22 Gentoo/AMD64 Project, Gentoo Scientific Project
23 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
24 Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
25
26 iD8DBQFDg1/QaVNL8NrtU6IRApExAKCnhZf9k+PjJOpWTYlO+C4Np+csigCeO3tC
27 Eh8xRxPL3AHyqRylAtTjvuc=
28 =/oto
29 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
30 --
31 gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list

Replies