Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@×××.net>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: [gentoo-dev] Re: Re: RFC: Niches and new developers (especially xbox)
Date: Sat, 12 Jun 2004 09:43:14
Message-Id: pan.2004.06.12.09.43.08.112588@cox.net
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: RFC: Niches and new developers (especially xbox) by Chris Gianelloni
1 Chris Gianelloni posted <1086977160.28454.108.camel@localhost>, excerpted
2 below, on Fri, 11 Jun 2004 14:06:00 -0400:
3
4 > Perhaps if we had a section in the documentation along the lines of:
5 >
6 > "Due to the DMCA, we are unable to describe exactly how to get the boot
7 > loader onto the system. You can find this information on the xbox-linux
8 > site at xbox-linux.org"
9
10 Assuming the documentation itself breaks the DMCA, wouldn't this do so to?
11 Wasn't someone gagged by the MPA(N)A (N=Nazi <g>) for posting *LINKS* to
12 DeCSS?
13
14 Maybe that worked its way thru the courts and was eventually allowed. I
15 don't know. However, depending on the circumstances, it could still be
16 asking for nuisance suits.
17
18 What about this instead?
19
20 "Due to the DMCA, we are unable to describe exactly how to get the boot
21 loader onto the system. We cannot even LINK to them due to US censorship.
22 However, the information IS out there, and as they say, 'Google is your
23 friend.'"
24
25 If even THAT is considered to close, just leave it as .."the information
26 IS out there, if you wish to go looking for it."
27
28 IANAL and all that, but IMO, it'd be pretty hard to gag the last form.
29
30 --
31 Duncan - List replies preferred. No HTML msgs.
32 "They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little
33 temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety." --
34 Benjamin Franklin
35
36
37
38 --
39 gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Re: RFC: Niches and new developers (especially xbox) Chris Gianelloni <wolf31o2@g.o>