| 1 |
On Tue, Jul 10, 2018 at 9:38 AM kuzetsa <kuzetsa@×××××.com> wrote: |
| 2 |
> |
| 3 |
> I think authorship is a good point / distinction, Mart. |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
> Authorship was never shown in dev-timeline for addresses |
| 6 |
> which aren't @gentoo.org anyway. That's a separate issue, |
| 7 |
> so this policy change shouldn't affect proxy-maint? |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
Might I suggest bringing authorship issues into a separate thread? It |
| 11 |
really seems like a completely separate issue. IMO devs who are |
| 12 |
authors but not committers should probably also use their @g.o |
| 13 |
addresses, though it is a little less critical there. We're talking |
| 14 |
about the committer here, and the committer will always be a Gentoo |
| 15 |
dev for these repos, and I don't see any reason that we shouldn't have |
| 16 |
a matching email address between that and LDAP. The alternative would |
| 17 |
be to have some other key, and that just seems overly complex. |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
-- |
| 20 |
Rich |
Archives