| 1 |
On 07/09/2018 06:29 AM, Mart Raudsepp wrote: |
| 2 |
> Ühel kenal päeval, E, 09.07.2018 kell 10:40, kirjutas Michał Górny: |
| 3 |
>> Hi, |
| 4 |
>> |
| 5 |
>> We currently don't enforce any particular standard for e-mail |
| 6 |
>> addresses |
| 7 |
>> for developers committing to gentoo.git. FWICS, the majority of |
| 8 |
>> developers is using their @gentoo.org e-mail addresses. However, a |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
~{prune}~ |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
>> Is anyone opposed to that? Does anyone know of a valid reason to use |
| 15 |
>> non-@g.o address when committing? |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
> As long as that doesn't imply authorship, which seems to be as planned |
| 19 |
> (for committer field only, as you said). Hopefully it's easy for people |
| 20 |
> to set it up so that it uses gentoo address for committer and something |
| 21 |
> else for author, albeit I don't see any config for it, but should be |
| 22 |
> able to at least go via a script that uses the appropriate env vars. |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
~{prune}~ |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
> The only issue I see is that of slight complications on handling the |
| 29 |
> different addresses for author and commit, that's all that comes to |
| 30 |
> mind. |
| 31 |
> |
| 32 |
> |
| 33 |
> Mart |
| 34 |
> |
| 35 |
|
| 36 |
I think authorship is a good point / distinction, Mart. |
| 37 |
|
| 38 |
Authorship was never shown in dev-timeline for addresses |
| 39 |
which aren't @gentoo.org anyway. That's a separate issue, |
| 40 |
so this policy change shouldn't affect proxy-maint? |
| 41 |
|
| 42 |
(There are a few authors who are proxy-maintaining) |
| 43 |
|
| 44 |
--kuza |
Archives