1 |
On 09/09/2017 12:47 AM, Michał Górny wrote: |
2 |
> W dniu pią, 08.09.2017 o godzinie 17∶19 -0400, użytkownik Rich Freeman |
3 |
> napisał: |
4 |
>> On Tue, Jul 25, 2017 at 4:05 AM, Michał Górny <mgorny@g.o> wrote: |
5 |
>>> |
6 |
>>> What do you think about it? Is there anything else that needs being |
7 |
>>> covered? |
8 |
>>> |
9 |
>> |
10 |
>> FYI - if anybody does want to make any comments on the proposed |
11 |
>> devmanual changes to implement the new tags please comment at: |
12 |
>> |
13 |
>> https://github.com/gentoo/devmanual.gentoo.org/pull/72 |
14 |
>> |
15 |
>> For that matter, if you want to even know what the proposed changes |
16 |
>> are you should also visit the link. |
17 |
>> |
18 |
>> List replies seem to be discouraged. |
19 |
>> |
20 |
>> I realize that some prefer to limit comments to media that are purely |
21 |
>> open source. I guess the FOSS Linux kernel provided /dev/null still |
22 |
>> exists as an alternative. Honestly, I'm not sure which of the options |
23 |
>> are more likely to get read. |
24 |
>> |
25 |
> |
26 |
> TL;DR: Rich, I would really appreciate if you stopped the flamebaits. |
27 |
> I understand that you think you're doing Gentoo a favor but you're not. |
28 |
> |
29 |
> The footers were discussed to death in this very thread. I've heard your |
30 |
> opinions. However, as far as I'm concerned (and as I've pointed out) you |
31 |
> did literally *nothing* to push your ideas forward for 2+ years. |
32 |
> |
33 |
> Since I've done all the work, I've did it my way and for the reasons |
34 |
> I've explained multiple times. If you disagree, them I'm sorry but |
35 |
> in life you don't get to have everything your way. Especially if all you |
36 |
> do is complain and expect others to do the work for you. |
37 |
> |
38 |
> I understand that you're unhappy and since you have no valid arguments, |
39 |
> all you can do is try to get more people to support you and shout. |
40 |
> Revive the bikeshed as many times as possible, try to make a lot of |
41 |
> noise and block changes. Worst case, you've blocked something you didn't |
42 |
> like. Best case, you're finally get others so discouraged that they'll |
43 |
> do things your way just so that you stop. |
44 |
> |
45 |
> Rich, this is not a kindergarten. It's time you learn to lose, |
46 |
> and accept the consequences. If you can't do that, the door out is open, |
47 |
> and you're free to leave anytime you want. |
48 |
> |
49 |
This behavior is not befitting Gentoo leadership. Limiting commentary to |
50 |
a walled garden outside Gentoo control violates one of our goals |
51 |
(independence), and the incendiary retorts are no more mature than the |
52 |
behavior you're criticizing. Nothing will change in the way people |
53 |
respond to you until you learn how to treat others. |
54 |
|
55 |
By all means, I'm glad we're seeing some action on which tags to settle |
56 |
with. It's been a mess of confusion ("which tags do I use? Will this |
57 |
tick someone off?", etc), and will be easier to build on once we figure |
58 |
out the tags that'll work best. It'll be awesome to get automatic bug |
59 |
closing from a commit, and I suspect it'll bring a lot of good. Settling |
60 |
on tags allows us to automate more. However, as a Council member, the |
61 |
Gentoo community looks to you and your behavior as an example. Is this |
62 |
the example you want to set for our community? |
63 |
|
64 |
On the GitHub Issue, you called this mailing list "completely useless" |
65 |
[1], and then you sent your message above a little later. Would you want |
66 |
to work with someone who talks to you the way you treated Rich? |
67 |
|
68 |
None of this bickering is motivating or inspiring to those who read it, |
69 |
and leadership should know better than to stoop to this level publicly. |
70 |
You will not get more developer activity, agreement, cooperation, or |
71 |
contribution by berating your fellow developers. In fact, Gentoo is |
72 |
known for its bickering developer community. You are in a position to |
73 |
change that. You asserted in #gentoo-trustees that the Council *is* |
74 |
Gentoo's leadership. |
75 |
|
76 |
Is this your brand of leadership? |
77 |
|
78 |
~zlg |
79 |
|
80 |
[1] https://dev.gentoo.org/~zlg/useless.png |
81 |
|
82 |
(screenshotted since GitHub conversations can be curated.) |
83 |
-- |
84 |
Daniel Campbell - Gentoo Developer, Trustee, Treasurer |
85 |
OpenPGP Key: 0x1EA055D6 @ hkp://keys.gnupg.net |
86 |
fpr: AE03 9064 AE00 053C 270C 1DE4 6F7A 9091 1EA0 55D6 |