Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Donnie Berkholz <spyderous@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] No XFree86 w/ new license
Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2004 20:40:31
Message-Id: 1077223226.28848.2.camel@localhost
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] No XFree86 w/ new license by Svyatogor
1 On Thu, 2004-02-19 at 15:43, Svyatogor wrote:
2 > The question I'm gonna ask might sound dumb, but still.
3 > I went other various discussions, read the new XFree license a lot of
4 > times and still do not get what is the problem with it?
5 >
6 > Escpet for point 3 (which is not a big issue, is it?) the rest of the
7 > license is very simmilar, if not identicale, to BSD.
8 >
9 > Could someone plz point me to those words in new version which cause all
10 > the troubles?
11
12 OK, let me lay it out as concisely as possible.
13
14 1) XFree86 license 1.1 _requires_ attribution with other third-party
15 attributions.
16
17 2) This requirement is an additional restriction beyond what the GPL
18 itself restricts.
19
20 3) The GPL prohibits any additional restrictions.
21
22 From these three points we conclude:
23
24 4) The XFree86 license 1.1 is incompatible with the GPL.
25
26 Thanks,
27 Donnie
28 --
29 Donnie Berkholz
30 Desktop project co-manager,
31 Cluster project co-lead,
32 Developer Relations,
33 Gentoo Linux

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] No XFree86 w/ new license Stewart Honsberger <blkdeath@g.o>