1 |
Hello All, |
2 |
|
3 |
As there are more questions rose. See you can't just think of everything, |
4 |
what you need is an ability to improve fast :-) |
5 |
|
6 |
---------------------------------------------- |
7 |
|
8 |
Thank you for all our feedback! |
9 |
|
10 |
In project like that I can't rush to programming it without |
11 |
everyone's approval. This part of the project should have been |
12 |
implemented with the first portage version by it's creator. But as |
13 |
I'm not this person I'll need the expertise of the whole community. |
14 |
|
15 |
Let's agree on following - I'll design the system in details on paper |
16 |
but no code will be produced at this stage. |
17 |
|
18 |
When it's ready (~ 1.5 months) I'll get back here and share the design |
19 |
sketches with you. |
20 |
|
21 |
Then we all review it again everyone could contribute it's own view |
22 |
and part and help to avoid some design problems if there are. |
23 |
|
24 |
I need an agreement on this stage from the list. |
25 |
|
26 |
If you consider PortageQOS is not necessary please vote NO. |
27 |
If you consider PortageQOS might have a chance and it depends on |
28 |
implementation say YES. |
29 |
|
30 |
|
31 |
Please vote. |
32 |
|
33 |
|
34 |
If NO there is no need to spend time even on sketches. |
35 |
If YES - there will be a system design ready and we could at least |
36 |
imagine how it might work as a whole and benefits it might bring. |
37 |
|
38 |
|
39 |
------------------------------------------------------------------ |
40 |
|
41 |
BY VOTING WE MAKE NO ASSUMPTION that the PROJECT is going to be INTEGRATED |
42 |
in GENTOO without further approval. |
43 |
|
44 |
At this stage the design will serve only as a demonstration that such |
45 |
system could actually be implemented and used for benefits of GENTOO |
46 |
project. |
47 |
|
48 |
If community finds the design worth trying we'll push it for approval |
49 |
and then it will be implemented. |
50 |
|
51 |
------------------------------------------------------------------ |
52 |
|
53 |
|
54 |
PS |
55 |
No way PortageQOS will work without uniform agreement. That thing |
56 |
was missing from portage design from the start and now with the legacy |
57 |
it's either everyone is willing to give it a try or none. I don't want |
58 |
to push somebody to something he doesn't see purpose for. There are |
59 |
people here who spent lots of time on the project and it might be left |
60 |
as is if they don't want any change. |
61 |
|
62 |
-- |
63 |
Best regards, |
64 |
Igor mailto:lanthruster@×××××.com |