1 |
On Fri, Sep 27, 2002 at 02:12:31AM +0200, Henrik Treadup wrote: |
2 |
> I don't like the idea of closing this list. If you close it you will still |
3 |
> have problems with spam in the open lists; user, newbie etc. A better way |
4 |
> of doing things would be to filter out the spam completley on all the |
5 |
> lists. |
6 |
> There was an interesting thread about Bayesian spam filtering on slashdot |
7 |
> http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=02/09/17/1746248&mode=thread&tid=111 |
8 |
> a while ago discussing Paul Grahams essay A Plan for Spam |
9 |
> http://www.paulgraham.com/spam.html |
10 |
> |
11 |
> The statistical approach described there would have filtered out all spam |
12 |
> I have seen on this list so far. (How many non spam email contain the words |
13 |
> 'dear' and 'madam' ?) |
14 |
> |
15 |
> You might wan't to check out ESR's implementation |
16 |
> http://bogofilter.sourceforge.net |
17 |
|
18 |
Or filter the list through spamassassin before it goes out to mailman (or |
19 |
something like that). |
20 |
|
21 |
alan |
22 |
|
23 |
-- |
24 |
Alan "Arcterex" <alan@×××××.org> -=][=- http://arcterex.net |
25 |
"I used to herd dairy cows. Now I herd lusers. Apart from the isolation, I |
26 |
think I preferred the cows. They were better conversation, easier to milk, and |
27 |
if they annoyed me enough, I could shoot them and eat them." -Rodger Donaldson |