From: | grozin@g.o | ||
---|---|---|---|
To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: repo/gentoo:master commit in: dev-libs/libunibreak/ | ||
Date: | Thu, 14 Dec 2017 13:25:02 | ||
Message-Id: | alpine.LRH.2.21.1712142016310.8634@star.inp.nsk.su | ||
In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: repo/gentoo:master commit in: dev-libs/libunibreak/ by Fabian Groffen |
1 | If the developers of liblinebreak had not decided to rename their library, |
2 | I could safely bump it from 2.1 to 4.0, in spite of the fact that it is |
3 | maintainer-needed, right? |
4 | Am I personally responsible for their decision to use the new name |
5 | libunibreak? |
6 | If there are QA problems in libunibreak-4.0.ebuild, they are surely shared |
7 | by liblinebreak-2.1.ebuild (which is stable on amd64, ppc and x86, and |
8 | ~arm). Why these problems were not cought for many years |
9 | liblinebreak-2.1.ebuild is in the tree? (it is there from before the git |
10 | migration, git log only shows trivial commits not changing its |
11 | functionality) |
12 | |
13 | Andrey |
Subject | Author |
---|---|
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: repo/gentoo:master commit in: dev-libs/libunibreak/ | Mike Gilbert <floppym@g.o> |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: repo/gentoo:master commit in: dev-libs/libunibreak/ | "Michał Górny" <mgorny@g.o> |
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: repo/gentoo:master commit in: dev-libs/libunibreak/ | "Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn" <chithanh@g.o> |