Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Patrick Lauer <patrick@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in media-sound/umurmur: metadata.xml ChangeLog
Date: Wed, 25 Dec 2013 13:13:21
In Reply to: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in media-sound/umurmur: metadata.xml ChangeLog by hasufell
1 >
2 > You are interfering with my workflow and I already told you why I kept
3 > the useflag, so stop reverting my commits after I told you the reasons
4 > in a private mail.
6 Eh, it's been two days, and the temporary issue is still there ...
8 Fix your workflow not to rely on repoman warnings being nonfatal, then I
9 won't have any reason to annoy you.
11 (And I thought that was a one-time oopsie, not an issue that'll appear
12 more often)
14 > QA is more than just running repoman and doing random commits on other
15 > peoples ebuilds.
17 Being a dev is more than just doing your thing and ignoring the rest.
18 I'm getting tired of cleaning up behind people (not only you, it's on
19 average 2 issues a day I have to figure out and either fix or file
20 bugs). Don't expect any lenience or tolerance as long as the average is
21 that bad, I just prune the list of repoman warnings and errors down as
22 far as possible.
24 (Today alone I filed 4 bugs for gnome [incomplete gnome-3.6 removal],
25 had to clean up after a stabilization bug [cups-filters], fixed a ruby
26 package that had now unsatisfiable ruby_targets [fxruby] ... and maybe
27 I've even forgotten a thing or two there. See how you adding random
28 spurious warnings is not improving my mood? ;) )
30 Have a nice pagan ritual day,
32 Patrick