| 1 |
On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 09:19:36AM -0400, Rich Freeman wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 8:32 AM, Kent Fredric <kentnl@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 |
> > |
| 4 |
> > So if this commit was to get teleported to a different repo, |
| 5 |
> > --signoff by would be preserved, as an intermediate between these two. |
| 6 |
> > |
| 7 |
> > So I think the intent for this is "X reviewed these changes for Gentoo |
| 8 |
> > and takes responsibility for them" |
| 9 |
> > |
| 10 |
> > what text you use to convey that is irrelevant, as long as its used |
| 11 |
> > consistently and everyone understands what the text means. |
| 12 |
> > |
| 13 |
> |
| 14 |
> Actually, the text matters a great deal, which is why projects that |
| 15 |
> care about copyright tend to have an explicit DCO. One for Gentoo was |
| 16 |
> in the works but has stalled somewhat (to be fair, it was stalled |
| 17 |
> originally because we were waiting for git to come along). It |
| 18 |
> probably makes sense to at least get that into effect even if we don't |
| 19 |
> have a long-term strategy around copyright attribution and so on. |
| 20 |
> |
| 21 |
> The last draft DCO was: |
| 22 |
> Gentoo DCO 1.0 By making a contribution to this project, I certify |
| 23 |
> that: (a) The contribution was created in whole or in part by me and I |
| 24 |
> have the right to submit it under the open source license indicated in |
| 25 |
> the file; or (b) The contribution is based upon previous work that, to |
| 26 |
> the best of my knowledge, is covered under an appropriate open source |
| 27 |
> license and I have the right under that license to submit that work |
| 28 |
> with modifications, whether created in whole or in part by me, under |
| 29 |
> the same open source license (unless I am permitted to submit under a |
| 30 |
> different license), as indicated in the file; or (c) The contribution |
| 31 |
> was provided directly to me by some other person who certified (a), |
| 32 |
> (b) or (c) and I have not modified it. (d) I understand and agree that |
| 33 |
> this project and the contribution are public and that a record of the |
| 34 |
> contribution (including all personal information I submit with it, |
| 35 |
> including my sign-off) is maintained indefinitely and may be |
| 36 |
> redistributed consistent with this project or the open source |
| 37 |
> license(s) involved. |
| 38 |
> |
| 39 |
> This is from the last policy draft: |
| 40 |
> https://dev.gentoo.org/~rich0/copyrightpolicy.xml |
| 41 |
|
| 42 |
Why redraft the already-useful DCO that is out there for you to use |
| 43 |
as-is: |
| 44 |
http://developercertificate.org/ |
| 45 |
|
| 46 |
As you copied the text, be sure to give proper reference to who owns the |
| 47 |
copyright of that text please, you just can't rename it and claim it as |
| 48 |
your own :) |
| 49 |
|
| 50 |
thanks, |
| 51 |
|
| 52 |
greg k-h |
Archives