| 1 |
Am Donnerstag, 17. Januar 2013, 14:57:16 schrieb Ben de Groot: |
| 2 |
> |
| 3 |
> After some initial bikeshedding we came to the conclusion that naming |
| 4 |
> the category simply "qt" is the most elegant solution. We will then |
| 5 |
> also be dropping the qt- prefix in package names. This means |
| 6 |
> x11-libs/qt-core will be moved to qt/core, and so on. |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
Please don't. |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
This is not about standards, but about consistency. About everyone else uses |
| 12 |
the two-part category-names witha-dash. Why can't you? It is what I would |
| 13 |
immediately expect, instead of a "hyper-toplevel" "qt". |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
My suggestion would be qt-base (analogous to kde-base, gnome-base, gnustep- |
| 16 |
base, lxde-base, and xfce-base) for everything that is part of the main Qt |
| 17 |
release. |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
-- |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
Andreas K. Huettel |
| 22 |
Gentoo Linux developer |
| 23 |
dilfridge@g.o |
| 24 |
http://www.akhuettel.de/ |
Archives