Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Thomas Beaudry <k8la@××××.net>
To: gentoo-dev@××××××××××.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] why multilog?
Date: Sat, 14 Jul 2001 20:40:08
Message-Id: 20010715.2391400@localhost.localdomain
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] why multilog? by Daniel Robbins
1 What is the licensing? I looked through the web site and the source code
2 and could find nothing but his copyright notice. Maybe I'm just blind...
3
4 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Original Message <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<
5
6 > Also, I'm having Jerry look for a supervise replacement, as both multilog
7 and
8 > supervise (daemontools) have non-open source licenses as it turns out,
9 and
10 > should not be in our default base distribution.

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] why multilog? Jerry A! <jerry@×××××××.org>