From: | Thomas Beaudry <k8la@××××.net> | ||
---|---|---|---|
To: | gentoo-dev@××××××××××.org | ||
Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] why multilog? | ||
Date: | Sat, 14 Jul 2001 20:40:08 | ||
Message-Id: | 20010715.2391400@localhost.localdomain | ||
In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] why multilog? by Daniel Robbins |
1 | What is the licensing? I looked through the web site and the source code |
2 | and could find nothing but his copyright notice. Maybe I'm just blind... |
3 | |
4 | >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Original Message <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<< |
5 | |
6 | > Also, I'm having Jerry look for a supervise replacement, as both multilog |
7 | and |
8 | > supervise (daemontools) have non-open source licenses as it turns out, |
9 | and |
10 | > should not be in our default base distribution. |
Subject | Author |
---|---|
Re: [gentoo-dev] why multilog? | Jerry A! <jerry@×××××××.org> |