Archives
Archives
| From: | Daniel Robbins <drobbins@g.o> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-dev@××××××××××.org | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] why multilog? | ||
| Date: | Sat, 14 Jul 2001 12:28:49 | ||
| Message-Id: | 20010714122849.B397@cvs.gentoo.org | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] why multilog? by AGottinger@t-online.de (Achim Gottinger) | ||
| 1 | On Sat, Jul 14, 2001 at 03:37:20PM +0200, Achim Gottinger wrote: |
| 2 | |
| 3 | > Yep, good idea, I switched back to syslog too. |
| 4 | |
| 5 | Also, I'm having Jerry look for a supervise replacement, as both multilog and |
| 6 | supervise (daemontools) have non-open source licenses as it turns out, and |
| 7 | should not be in our default base distribution. |
| 8 | |
| 9 | -- |
| 10 | Daniel Robbins <drobbins@g.o> |
| 11 | President/CEO http://www.gentoo.org |
| 12 | Gentoo Technologies, Inc. |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-dev] why multilog? | Thomas Beaudry <k8la@××××.net> |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] why multilog? | Thomas Beaudry <k8la@××××.net> |