Archives
Archives
| From: | Thomas Beaudry <k8la@××××.net> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-dev@××××××××××.org | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] why multilog? | ||
| Date: | Sat, 21 Jul 2001 04:27:25 | ||
| Message-Id: | 20010721.10273700@localhost.localdomain | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] why multilog? by Daniel Robbins |
||
| 1 | If you're still looking for a supervise replacement, I just stumbled over |
| 2 | this: |
| 3 | |
| 4 | http://www.tildeslash.com/monit/ |
| 5 | |
| 6 | >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Original Message <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<< |
| 7 | |
| 8 | |
| 9 | > Also, I'm having Jerry look for a supervise replacement, as both multilog |
| 10 | and |
| 11 | > supervise (daemontools) have non-open source licenses as it turns out, |
| 12 | and |
| 13 | > should not be in our default base distribution. |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-dev] why multilog? | Daniel Robbins <drobbins@g.o> |