1 |
can help? |
2 |
|
3 |
https://lwn.net/Articles/74055/ |
4 |
|
5 |
|
6 |
On Fri, Jan 26, 2018 at 3:47 PM, Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@×××.net> wrote: |
7 |
|
8 |
> Ulrich Mueller posted on Fri, 26 Jan 2018 10:36:49 +0100 as excerpted: |
9 |
> |
10 |
> > Apparently licensing of the Gentoo repository was changed from GPL-2+ |
11 |
> > to GPL-2 (only) in 2002, see for example [1] and [2]. I cannot find any |
12 |
> > announcement or discussion about this. |
13 |
> > |
14 |
> > Who was around in 2002 and still remembers what was the rationale? |
15 |
> > |
16 |
> > Ulrich |
17 |
> > |
18 |
> > [1] |
19 |
> > https://gitweb.gentoo.org/repo/gentoo/historical.git/commit/skel.ebuild? |
20 |
> id=e67af11c176e4dca33846e65c2649aa456de3099 |
21 |
> > [2] |
22 |
> > https://gitweb.gentoo.org/repo/gentoo/historical.git/commit/header.txt? |
23 |
> id=dc4dfe8aa903fb467e648da80f8bc3178411a77a |
24 |
> |
25 |
> I wasn't around in 2002, but I was researching it by late 2003 and began |
26 |
> installing in early 2004, by which point Gentoo was suffering the |
27 |
> aftermath of the bitter split with Zynot and DRobbins was pretty much out |
28 |
> after having set up the Gentoo Foundation and (what became the) Council. |
29 |
> |
30 |
> The Zynot side was focused on embedding and trying to take things |
31 |
> commercial, while accusing DRobbins of trying to do effectively the same |
32 |
> thing but with a(n IIRC) gaming focus. |
33 |
> |
34 |
> That war has long since been fought and history has played out with |
35 |
> Gentoo still around and Zynot... not, so I'll try to avoid inserting |
36 |
> opinion /too/ much (tho I'm sure more recent events played out how they |
37 |
> did in part due to that history, people around then simply weren't |
38 |
> interested in what must have sounded rather similar), but... |
39 |
> |
40 |
> The switch to GPLv2-only would have been made in the fight for its life |
41 |
> that was the Gentoo/Zynot fork, and almost certainly had to do with |
42 |
> trying to ensure that the gentoo/x86 tree could not be taken private |
43 |
> without community recourse, in an era before GPLv3 existed and there was |
44 |
> some uncertainty about what its legal terms were going to be, while those |
45 |
> of the GPLv2 were known, it had broad community support, and was at |
46 |
> least /somewhat/ legally tested. |
47 |
> |
48 |
> Of course as we know it's possible for an entity owning copyright on a |
49 |
> GPLed work to also sell the rights to use it commercially, with the GPL |
50 |
> preventing others from doing the same, and that's what both sides were |
51 |
> accusing the other of trying to do, but as we've seen play out in other |
52 |
> contexts, the one thing the GPL /does/ do is provide a guarantee that the |
53 |
> code as-is will remain free, and community improvements to it without a |
54 |
> CLA letting the entity trying to take it proprietary are then disallowed |
55 |
> from being used to further that entity's plots. With the uncertainty |
56 |
> surrounding the still coming GPLv3 at that point, I believe the intent |
57 |
> was to ensure that continued. OTOH, those on the Zynot side would surely |
58 |
> argue that the intent was to ensure that Zynot couldn't take it private, |
59 |
> while Gentoo/DRobbins could, especially since at the time copyright was |
60 |
> assigned to Gentoo. Of course now we have the advantage of looking back |
61 |
> it it in history and can see how things turned out, but back then, it was |
62 |
> far less clear how things would turn out. |
63 |
> |
64 |
> -- |
65 |
> Duncan - List replies preferred. No HTML msgs. |
66 |
> "Every nonfree program has a lord, a master -- |
67 |
> and if you use the program, he is your master." Richard Stallman |
68 |
> |
69 |
> |
70 |
> |
71 |
|
72 |
|
73 |
-- |
74 |
Luigi 'Comio' Mantellini |
75 |
R&D - Software |
76 |
Industrie Dial Face S.p.A. |
77 |
Via Canzo, 4 |
78 |
20068 Peschiera Borromeo (MI), Italy |
79 |
|
80 |
Tel.: +39 02 5167 2813 |
81 |
Fax: +39 02 5167 2459 |
82 |
web: www.idf-hit.com |
83 |
mail: luigi.mantellini@×××××××.com |