1 |
On 30 Apr 2004, at 09:25, Kurt Lieber wrote: |
2 |
|
3 |
> On Fri, Apr 30, 2004 at 01:03:01AM -0500 or thereabouts, Joshua |
4 |
> Brindle wrote: |
5 |
>> gpg signed manifests |
6 |
> |
7 |
> By FAR this is the most important feature that we need, imo. Yes, I'm |
8 |
> a |
9 |
> broken record on this. No, I won't shut up. |
10 |
> |
11 |
>> glsa integration into portage (emerge --security or whatever) |
12 |
>> |
13 |
>> config tool rename (gcc-config vs. config-gcc or whatever) -- |
14 |
>> spyderous |
15 |
>> is working on this, i just want to make sure it's done for 2004.2 |
16 |
>> |
17 |
>> installer, at least a beta.. what is the status on the installer guys? |
18 |
> |
19 |
> I'd like to see these as well, but only after the gpg signed manifests |
20 |
> have |
21 |
> been implemented. |
22 |
|
23 |
I haven't seen anything tangible about a beta installer. |
24 |
|
25 |
History learns that it will most likely be totally PPC incompatible and |
26 |
require hours of patching on my part. Hours I'd like to spend on some, |
27 |
more thrilling parts such as portage-ng. |
28 |
|
29 |
Pieter |
30 |
|
31 |
> |
32 |
> --kurt |
33 |
|
34 |
|
35 |
-- |
36 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |