Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Pieter Van den Abeele <pvdabeel@g.o>
To: Kurt Lieber <klieber@g.o>
Cc: zhen@g.o, gentoo-dev@l.g.o, Pieter Van den Abeele <pvdabeel@g.o>, Joshua Brindle <method@g.o>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] 2004.2 Feature Requests
Date: Fri, 30 Apr 2004 16:37:09
Message-Id: 9E8E490A-9AC4-11D8-8275-0003938E7E46@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] 2004.2 Feature Requests by Kurt Lieber
1 On 30 Apr 2004, at 09:25, Kurt Lieber wrote:
2
3 > On Fri, Apr 30, 2004 at 01:03:01AM -0500 or thereabouts, Joshua
4 > Brindle wrote:
5 >> gpg signed manifests
6 >
7 > By FAR this is the most important feature that we need, imo. Yes, I'm
8 > a
9 > broken record on this. No, I won't shut up.
10 >
11 >> glsa integration into portage (emerge --security or whatever)
12 >>
13 >> config tool rename (gcc-config vs. config-gcc or whatever) --
14 >> spyderous
15 >> is working on this, i just want to make sure it's done for 2004.2
16 >>
17 >> installer, at least a beta.. what is the status on the installer guys?
18 >
19 > I'd like to see these as well, but only after the gpg signed manifests
20 > have
21 > been implemented.
22
23 I haven't seen anything tangible about a beta installer.
24
25 History learns that it will most likely be totally PPC incompatible and
26 require hours of patching on my part. Hours I'd like to spend on some,
27 more thrilling parts such as portage-ng.
28
29 Pieter
30
31 >
32 > --kurt
33
34
35 --
36 gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] 2004.2 Feature Requests Donnie Berkholz <spyderous@g.o>