Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: "Diego Elio Pettenò" <flameeyes@×××××××××.eu>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] more help needed with gcc-4.8 stabilization, chromium starts heavily using C++11
Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2014 16:29:03
Message-Id: CAHcsgXQd=qxdNnJnqsJMBMyD3GkmGwiyO7_8XZS9y=bE5MAycg@mail.gmail.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] more help needed with gcc-4.8 stabilization, chromium starts heavily using C++11 by hasufell
1 On 19 October 2014 16:57, hasufell <hasufell@g.o> wrote:
2 >> If maintainers want to NEEDINFO or WONTFIX a tinderbox bug, well,
3 >> they'll be the ones picking up the pieces when the gcc upgrade moves
4 >> ahead.
5 >
6 > We are all picking up the pieces.
7 >
8 >> I don't get why anybody wouldn't like seeing them.
9 >>
10 >
11 > I do, it's childish and uncollaborative behavior from that person
12 > closing the bugs (any1 still wondering who we are talking about?). And
13 > that behavior is tolerated. Are you saying you want to change something
14 > about it?
15
16 So who wants to pick up the pieces now? Because I'm almost pissed off
17 enough to turn down the tinderbox and give a big FU to Gentoo already.
18 https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=527608
19
20 Diego Elio Pettenò — Flameeyes
21 flameeyes@×××××××××.eu — http://blog.flameeyes.eu/

Replies