| 1 |
On Sat, Jan 7, 2017 at 2:05 PM, Mart Raudsepp <leio@g.o> wrote: |
| 2 |
> |
| 3 |
> If gentoo-dev feel the need to set Reply-To in my place, then gentoo- |
| 4 |
> dev-announce should do the same and not throw my mail into /dev/null, |
| 5 |
> but into some regular moderation rules after setting the Reply-To |
| 6 |
> itself then. |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
Not all replies to gentoo-dev-announce should go to gentoo-dev. Some |
| 10 |
belong on gentoo-project, or maybe even gentoo-nfp or some other less |
| 11 |
common list. Hence the need to set a reply-to. |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
Perhaps it should just be called gentoo-announce, though it is mostly |
| 14 |
aimed at developers. In the past people used to send stuff like this |
| 15 |
to -core, but that led to a lot of over-use of -core which is private |
| 16 |
to devs only. Now -core is only used very rarely and for the sorts of |
| 17 |
things it was intended for (exchanging phone numbers at conferences, |
| 18 |
etc), so in that it was a pretty big success and it makes us more |
| 19 |
open. |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
-- |
| 22 |
Rich |
Archives