| 1 |
On Thu, 2006-08-24 at 13:14 -0500, Lance Albertson wrote: |
| 2 |
> For the record, I was waiting for those folks to come to us to resolve |
| 3 |
> it. Last I knew we had a partial resolution with the parties involved, |
| 4 |
> but shortly after that they just stopped pursing it. I figured if it |
| 5 |
> was |
| 6 |
> that important to them, they'd get back with us. So I'm not sure what |
| 7 |
> happened to that exactly. If they weren't pursing it anymore, I didn't |
| 8 |
> see the point in us pursing it since they were the ones requesting |
| 9 |
> it. |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
It is important, and still on my todo list. I'm still awaiting the |
| 12 |
anon-cvs/svn/whatever to be finished before taking on the next part. Not |
| 13 |
trying to reopen the whole can of worms at them moment, but.. As for |
| 14 |
partial resolution, the discussion degenerated to having those saying it |
| 15 |
would cause classes of devs vs those saying they aren't devs and |
| 16 |
shouldn't have @g.o addresses from what I remember. I'll have to go |
| 17 |
re-read the thread to be sure. |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
-- |
| 20 |
Homer Parker <hparker@g.o> |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
-- |
| 23 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives