| 1 |
El mié, 14-08-2013 a las 23:53 +0800, Patrick Lauer escribió: |
| 2 |
[...] |
| 3 |
> Well, it should reflect reality. |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
> PMS is still broken as much as it does not reflect the state of portage |
| 6 |
> before PMS was written, and we've had to patch it up a few times to make |
| 7 |
> it coherent, plus it is still lacking half the things that would make it |
| 8 |
> useful as a standard. |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
> Your academic interpretation of standard as a platonic ideal |
| 11 |
> disconnected from reality serves no purpose. |
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
On this topic I agree with Patrick: I don't fully understand why things |
| 15 |
(like in_iuse from eutils.eclass) are missing from PMS. If that applies |
| 16 |
to more features that were forgotten when writing PMS, we have a |
| 17 |
problem :( |
Archives