| 1 |
On Thu, 15 Aug 2013 10:10:02 +0200 |
| 2 |
Pacho Ramos <pacho@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
> El mié, 14-08-2013 a las 23:53 +0800, Patrick Lauer escribió: |
| 5 |
> [...] |
| 6 |
> > Well, it should reflect reality. |
| 7 |
> > |
| 8 |
> > PMS is still broken as much as it does not reflect the state of |
| 9 |
> > portage before PMS was written, and we've had to patch it up a few |
| 10 |
> > times to make it coherent, plus it is still lacking half the things |
| 11 |
> > that would make it useful as a standard. |
| 12 |
> > |
| 13 |
> > Your academic interpretation of standard as a platonic ideal |
| 14 |
> > disconnected from reality serves no purpose. |
| 15 |
> > |
| 16 |
> |
| 17 |
> On this topic I agree with Patrick: I don't fully understand why |
| 18 |
> things (like in_iuse from eutils.eclass) are missing from PMS. |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
Why do things that can be in an eclass need to be in the PMS? |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
Or more specifically, why would you like to see in_iuse in the PMS? |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
-- |
| 25 |
With kind regards, |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
Tom Wijsman (TomWij) |
| 28 |
Gentoo Developer |
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
E-mail address : TomWij@g.o |
| 31 |
GPG Public Key : 6D34E57D |
| 32 |
GPG Fingerprint : C165 AF18 AB4C 400B C3D2 ABF0 95B2 1FCD 6D34 E57D |
Archives