| 1 |
On Saturday 24 July 2004 07:31 pm, Pieter Van den Abeele wrote: |
| 2 |
> I've changed my mind. I'm not going to change the virtual file |
| 3 |
> semantics in the MacOS profiles to get repoman to stop complaining. |
| 4 |
> Instead I wrote a small (4 lines) patch for repoman which does the |
| 5 |
> folowing: |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
> When repoman detects a macos-specific unsatisfied dependency it will |
| 8 |
> check the packages.build file |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
that's a pretty ugly hack |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
are you suggesting we do this with every new random arch we add that isnt a |
| 13 |
standard linux port ? seems like an unintuitive workaround |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
why not push something a little more intelligent ... perhaps a new file for |
| 16 |
portage to utilize in cases like this ... the profile has a special file |
| 17 |
where you can define packages that are assumed to be satisified |
| 18 |
-mike |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
-- |
| 21 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives