Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Natanael Copa <natanael.copa@×××××.com>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Monthly Gentoo Council Reminder for March
Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2008 05:12:50
Message-Id: 1205125963.7136.28.camel@nc.nor.wtbts.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Monthly Gentoo Council Reminder for March by Marius Mauch
1 On Fri, 2008-03-07 at 19:48 +0100, Marius Mauch wrote:
2
3 > What exact time constraints and responsibilities are people afraid of?
4 > Are those concerns real or just myths?
5
6 As someone who just sent in the quiz, yes its real concerns. What scared
7 me off mostly is the gentoo politics. The entire process to become a
8 "gentoo developer" is a scare off. Took me weeks to complete the quiz. I
9 want to help, yes, but I do have a life.
10
11 > > A formal proxy-maintainer could really help in our sometimes blind
12 > > maintaining duties.
13 >
14 > What would be the difference between a "formal proxy-maintainer" and
15 > how we handle it currently?
16
17 It's documented? I hardly know it was possible. I have heard the term
18 proxy maintainer a few time and offerend to become one without beeing
19 100% what it was. I talked about to become a dev only to be able to
20 maintain a handful ebuilds but was even recommended to not do that due
21 to QA issues. That kind of turned me off [1].
22
23 At the same time I go the offer to maintain a package in FreeBSD. I said
24 yes because it was very simple. So I have been a freebsd ports
25 maintainer for years, while it took me years to actually take the step
26 to fill in the quiz, even if i run gentoo on desktop and run my own
27 distro based on Gentoo.
28
29 I'd probably not do the quiz again but I'd be more than happy to
30 maintain a few packages.
31
32 > Marius
33
34 -nc
35
36 [1]http://www.mail-archive.com/gentoo-dev@l.g.o/msg15926.html
37
38 PS. The entire thread is kind of interesting to read.
39
40
41 --
42 gentoo-dev@l.g.o mailing list

Replies