Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Gordon Pettey <petteyg359@×××××.com>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Please stay on-topic.
Date: Fri, 09 Dec 2016 23:06:53
Message-Id: CAHY5Medci-ZEx_wv0iL48V6QQmmWcuK93NYHhSjzNYTpsS0Dvg@mail.gmail.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Please stay on-topic. by "William L. Thomson Jr."
1 On Fri, Dec 9, 2016 at 4:36 PM, William L. Thomson Jr. <wlt-ml@××××××.com>
2 wrote:
3
4 > Java on Gentoo is really not bad, if you are familiar with Java at all.
5 >
6
7 It's actually quite insane "if you're familiar with Java at all"...
8
9 Building C and C++ from source is great. 51% of dev-java category is doing
10 pointless work. 401 ebuilds only have IUSE="doc source" which can almost
11 always be fetched from Maven Central, and 44 ebuilds have no USE flags at
12 all. That's just from simple grep results. Given the ugly majority there, I
13 don't doubt there's some silliness going on in the remaining 49%. Building
14 Java from source to get the exact same jar file every time on a million
15 machines when you could just fetch the upstream jar instead is plain stupid.

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Please stay on-topic. "William L. Thomson Jr." <wlt-ml@××××××.com>