Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Ciaran McCreesh <ciaranm@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] GLEP 36: providing both CVS and Subversion?
Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2005 06:27:31
Message-Id: 20050413072608.34f29cb9@snowdrop
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] GLEP 36: providing both CVS and Subversion? by Christian Parpart
1 On Wed, 13 Apr 2005 03:33:46 +0200 Christian Parpart <trapni@g.o>
2 wrote:
3 | Finally, just don't use svn if you feel that uncomfortable with it. No
4 | one said that cvs will go away. I'm tired of reading your 'svn is
5 | hard to merge because it *is* hard to merge' posts :(
6
7 Eh? Dude, I'm one of the people that's been asking for SVN from the
8 beginning. SVN is considerably easier to merge than CVS -- however, it's
9 a pain in the ass if you're using multiple projects per repo because
10 then you *have* to give it full paths.
11
12 Really, I think you should reread the entire thread if you think I'm
13 against SVN.
14
15 --
16 Ciaran McCreesh : Gentoo Developer (Vim, Fluxbox, shell tools)
17 Mail : ciaranm at gentoo.org
18 Web : http://dev.gentoo.org/~ciaranm

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] GLEP 36: providing both CVS and Subversion? Aaron Walker <ka0ttic@g.o>