Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Aaron Walker <ka0ttic@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] GLEP 36: providing both CVS and Subversion?
Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2005 13:04:41
Message-Id: 425D18BD.6000506@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] GLEP 36: providing both CVS and Subversion? by Ciaran McCreesh
1 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
2 Hash: SHA1
3
4 Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
5 > On Wed, 13 Apr 2005 03:33:46 +0200 Christian Parpart <trapni@g.o>
6 > wrote:
7 > | Finally, just don't use svn if you feel that uncomfortable with it. No
8 > | one said that cvs will go away. I'm tired of reading your 'svn is
9 > | hard to merge because it *is* hard to merge' posts :(
10 >
11 > Eh? Dude, I'm one of the people that's been asking for SVN from the
12 > beginning. SVN is considerably easier to merge than CVS -- however, it's
13 > a pain in the ass if you're using multiple projects per repo because
14 > then you *have* to give it full paths.
15 >
16 > Really, I think you should reread the entire thread if you think I'm
17 > against SVN.
18 >
19
20 Yeah actually the glep wouldnt exist at all w/o Ciaran pawning it off on me :)
21
22 - --
23 Qooesshun oothureety.
24 Bork Bork Bork!
25
26 Aaron Walker <ka0ttic@g.o>
27 [ BSD | cron | forensics | shell-tools | commonbox | netmon | vim | web-apps ]
28 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
29 Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
30
31 iD8DBQFCXRi9C3poscuANHARAqH1AJ9TcnyHcH2AaadwWn9mxAvis2i2GQCgw4QI
32 Tg1kMLEFqPlrCmPlPlqFgQ4=
33 =GbRS
34 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
35 --
36 gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] GLEP 36: providing both CVS and Subversion? Christian Parpart <trapni@g.o>