| 1 |
On Sunday 19 September 2004 11:30, Simone Gotti wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Saturday 18 September 2004 21:36, Dan Armak wrote: |
| 3 |
> > Come to think of it, there is one other issue; some kde makefiles are |
| 4 |
> > badly written, and link against libraries built in the source tree under |
| 5 |
> > $S rather than against installed libraries under /usr/kde/.... To |
| 6 |
> > separate the library and app into two ebuilds we'd need to fix such |
| 7 |
> > makefiles. Because I'm speaking from somewhat dated knowledge here, and |
| 8 |
> > have nevr actually tried to fix such makefiles ;-), I don't know how |
| 9 |
> > difficult it'd be or how widespread the problem is today. |
| 10 |
> > |
| 11 |
> > Anything else I'm forgetting? |
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
> The aren't badly written, this is the right behavior, For example kmail |
| 14 |
> wants to compile against libkdepim. You can't link against a library that |
| 15 |
> isn't already installed o an old installed one with less functions. |
| 16 |
Should be a fallback IMHO. configure can check for things like that. At least, |
| 17 |
we're going to have to make it do that if we go through with this :-) |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
As for old versions, isn't that what library versions are for? |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
-- |
| 22 |
Dan Armak |
| 23 |
Gentoo Linux developer (KDE) |
| 24 |
Matan, Israel |
| 25 |
Public GPG key: http://dev.gentoo.org/~danarmak/danarmak-gpg-public.key |
| 26 |
Fingerprint: DD70 DBF9 E3D4 6CB9 2FDD 0069 508D 9143 8D5F 8951 |
Archives