1 |
On Tue, Jan 1, 2013 at 9:37 PM, Benjamin Peterson <benjamin@××××××.org> wrote: |
2 |
> Michael Mol <mikemol <at> gmail.com> writes: |
3 |
>> On Tue, Jan 1, 2013 at 5:51 AM, Dirkjan Ochtman <djc <at> gentoo.org> wrote: |
4 |
>> > Speaking of which, say what you will about Mozilla's broken criteria |
5 |
>> > for root inclusion, but Mozilla has no commercial interests, |
6 |
>> |
7 |
>> Wait, what? How does taking income during a process not constitute a |
8 |
>> commercial interest? |
9 |
> |
10 |
> There seems to be some confusion about Mozilla's cert inclusion process. Mozilla |
11 |
> does not make any money by including CA certificates. Per its own policy [1], |
12 |
> "We will not charge any fees to have a CA's certificate(s) distributed with our |
13 |
> software products." |
14 |
> |
15 |
> [1] https://www.mozilla.org/projects/security/certs/policy/InclusionPolicy.html |
16 |
|
17 |
Fair enough. I took Rich's email as an indication they did. |
18 |
|
19 |
|
20 |
|
21 |
-- |
22 |
:wq |