| 1 |
Michael Mol <mikemol <at> gmail.com> writes: |
| 2 |
> On Tue, Jan 1, 2013 at 5:51 AM, Dirkjan Ochtman <djc <at> gentoo.org> wrote: |
| 3 |
> > Speaking of which, say what you will about Mozilla's broken criteria |
| 4 |
> > for root inclusion, but Mozilla has no commercial interests, |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
> Wait, what? How does taking income during a process not constitute a |
| 7 |
> commercial interest? |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
There seems to be some confusion about Mozilla's cert inclusion process. Mozilla |
| 10 |
does not make any money by including CA certificates. Per its own policy [1], |
| 11 |
"We will not charge any fees to have a CA's certificate(s) distributed with our |
| 12 |
software products." |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
[1] https://www.mozilla.org/projects/security/certs/policy/InclusionPolicy.html |
Archives