Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Johannes Findeisen <you@×××××.org>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] possible trojan in openssh-3.4p1
Date: Fri, 02 Aug 2002 04:58:22
Message-Id: 200208020936.40432.you@hanez.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] possible trojan in openssh-3.4p1 by Rob Kaper
1 On Thursday 01 August 2002 15:39, Rob Kaper wrote:
2 > On Thursday 01 August 2002 15:35, Terje Kvernes wrote:
3 > > if the checksum differ, which it would have, emerge will abort.
4 > > although, emerge logs do sound like a very good idea.
5 >
6 > For optimum security, emerge should check checksums from different
7 > locations. One or two trusted servers (often even the same as the one where
8 > the files reside, although that might not be true for gentoo) can be
9 > compromised too easily.
10
11 if this should be a option in portage, we always need to download two files
12 from two servers to check if the md5sum are the same... :-(
13 IMO it is good as it is. the gentoo-core team are providing a md5sum in the
14 portage tree and that should be enough.
15
16 regards
17 hanez... ;-)
18
19 --
20 begin .signature
21 question: is it a feature to execute code in emails?
22 i don't think so!
23 end

Replies

Subject Author
[gentoo-dev] Re: possible trojan in openssh-3.4p1 "A.Waschbuesch" <awaschb@××××.de>
Re: [gentoo-dev] possible trojan in openssh-3.4p1 Jean-Michel Smith <jean@××××.com>