Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Jan Matejka <yac@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC GLEP 1005: Package Tags
Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2014 07:05:01
Message-Id: 20140325080308.09d349bc@deathstar
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC GLEP 1005: Package Tags by Jeroen Roovers
1 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
2 Hash: SHA512
3
4 On Mon, 24 Mar 2014 15:25:12 +0100
5 Jeroen Roovers <jer@g.o> wrote:
6
7 > On Mon, 24 Mar 2014 12:36:19 +0100
8 > Jan Matejka <yac@g.o> wrote:
9 >
10 > > Categories are essentially tags, only less powerful as they can
11 > > express relationship of 1:N while tags are can express M:N
12 >
13 > No, categories are essentially directories.
14
15 fixed: categories are essentially also directories.
16
17 same thing, 1:N relationship without symlinks and other misuse of
18 filesystem.
19
20 > I was asking about tags, not about categories.
21
22 The original mails are:
23
24 > On Sun, 23 Mar 2014 15:46:09 +0100
25 > Jeroen Roovers <jer@g.o> wrote:
26 >
27 > > On Sat, 22 Mar 2014 15:33:27 -0700
28 > > Alec Warner <antarus@g.o> wrote:
29 > >
30 > > > https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Package_Tags
31 > >
32 > > "This GLEP author would love to blight categories out of gentoo
33 > > history as a giant mistake."
34 > >
35 > > Why?
36 > >
37 > >
38 > > jer
39
40 > Categories are essentially tags, only less powerful as they can
41 > express relationship of 1:N while tags are can express M:N
42
43 How is this a question about tags and not categories?
44
45 > It appears it's very hard to answer the simple questions of why we
46 > need tags and how we would use them. The answers should typically
47 > involve some explanation of how you're going to use the things once
48 > you have them.
49 >
50 >
51 > jer
52 >
53
54
55 - --
56 Jan Matějka | Gentoo Developer
57 https://gentoo.org | Gentoo Linux
58 GPG: A33E F5BC A9F6 DAFD 2021 6FB6 3EBF D45B EEB6 CA8B
59 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
60 Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux)
61
62 iQEcBAEBCgAGBQJTMSouAAoJEIN+7RD5ejaho4AH/1YFbArFwx6t8OoI8yrWCulA
63 LDt5qBAcZiJoqV9H1V5YdNgcNiLDKIyTCPbkWc4obkgRuNVIJxFAe+duYRQydudW
64 6KKS2lYQXWSkbDRmJTWOt7BnerHyemvk6AluQn741a2uPZyUI//FPQL8fZkYlR6i
65 3HFFlW0dI6PHa/9Np8G+RBAs29e8qAR7QKQzDLd9BF/s+6KIK2/FO8pAgMdZBVKk
66 jJ4Aq1AuRsqrdY0HO940Boiy0ylBFjxB27ej59UmjAzvyOMj9YRf1LqNkgMABENu
67 ohEckguSryOpBjjD2ZaZrfMbbJTGqfVgz44nhT0s6Nbocb5RmVYp988GIwFQCg4=
68 =1uIP
69 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC GLEP 1005: Package Tags Jeroen Roovers <jer@g.o>