From: | Ciaran McCreesh <ciaran.mccreesh@××××××××××.com> | ||
---|---|---|---|
To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Portage dependency solving algorithm (WAS: Regarding my final year thesis) | ||
Date: | Fri, 07 Nov 2014 18:07:36 | ||
Message-Id: | 20141107180723.2acdb8e7@googlemail.com | ||
In Reply to: | [gentoo-dev] Portage dependency solving algorithm (WAS: Regarding my final year thesis) by Jauhien Piatlicki |
1 | On Fri, 07 Nov 2014 10:42:39 +0100 |
2 | Jauhien Piatlicki <jauhien@g.o> wrote: |
3 | > Also may be we need to discuss how can we improve it, as at the moment |
4 | > for me it seems one of the biggest problems with Gentoo. And afaik |
5 | > paludis does not solve it (or am I wrong?) |
6 | |
7 | Paludis solves it. However, Paludis will only ever produce a correct |
8 | resolution, which can be a problem since ebuild dependencies are |
9 | often garbage... |
10 | |
11 | -- |
12 | Ciaran McCreesh |
File name | MIME type |
---|---|
signature.asc | application/pgp-signature |
Subject | Author |
---|---|
Re: [gentoo-dev] Portage dependency solving algorithm (WAS: Regarding my final year thesis) | Jauhien Piatlicki <jauhien@g.o> |