| 1 |
El vie, 27-07-2012 a las 13:24 -0400, Mike Frysinger escribió: |
| 2 |
> On Friday 27 July 2012 08:13:16 Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn wrote: |
| 3 |
> > Ulrich Mueller schrieb: |
| 4 |
> > > As I had pointed out before [1], changing from POSIX to an en_US |
| 5 |
> > > locale will have undesirable side effects, like commas as thousands |
| 6 |
> > > separators in numbers (because of LC_NUMERIC). Also the defaults of |
| 7 |
> > > en_US for LC_MEASUREMENT and LC_PAPER are only useful in the U.S. |
| 8 |
> > > |
| 9 |
> > > So if we change the default (but I still don't see the need), we |
| 10 |
> > > |
| 11 |
> > > should go for a less intrusive setting like: |
| 12 |
> > > LANG="POSIX" |
| 13 |
> > > LC_CTYPE="en_US.utf8" |
| 14 |
> > |
| 15 |
> > This would be better than LANG="en_US.utf8" but I would still prefer not |
| 16 |
> > to have any country/region attached to the locale. The C.UTF-8 locale |
| 17 |
> > which Debian uses for this purpose (a UTF-8 locale without side effects) |
| 18 |
> > appears more suitable to me. |
| 19 |
> |
| 20 |
> yes, and i'm waiting on the POSIX group to formalize C.UTF-8. that's the only |
| 21 |
> real option in my mind for making unicode the default. any other |
| 22 |
> amalgamations of various locales is ugly as sin. |
| 23 |
> -mike |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
Do you have any idea about how much time could that formalization take? |
| 26 |
If it will take a long time, maybe we could go to that amalgamations :-/ |
Archives