1 |
On Friday 27 July 2012 08:13:16 Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn wrote: |
2 |
> Ulrich Mueller schrieb: |
3 |
> > As I had pointed out before [1], changing from POSIX to an en_US |
4 |
> > locale will have undesirable side effects, like commas as thousands |
5 |
> > separators in numbers (because of LC_NUMERIC). Also the defaults of |
6 |
> > en_US for LC_MEASUREMENT and LC_PAPER are only useful in the U.S. |
7 |
> > |
8 |
> > So if we change the default (but I still don't see the need), we |
9 |
> > |
10 |
> > should go for a less intrusive setting like: |
11 |
> > LANG="POSIX" |
12 |
> > LC_CTYPE="en_US.utf8" |
13 |
> |
14 |
> This would be better than LANG="en_US.utf8" but I would still prefer not |
15 |
> to have any country/region attached to the locale. The C.UTF-8 locale |
16 |
> which Debian uses for this purpose (a UTF-8 locale without side effects) |
17 |
> appears more suitable to me. |
18 |
|
19 |
yes, and i'm waiting on the POSIX group to formalize C.UTF-8. that's the only |
20 |
real option in my mind for making unicode the default. any other |
21 |
amalgamations of various locales is ugly as sin. |
22 |
-mike |