1 |
Am Mittwoch, 7. August 2013, 10:46:04 schrieb Kacper Kowalik: |
2 |
> On 08/07/2013 01:57 AM, Andreas K. Huettel wrote: |
3 |
> > Am Dienstag, 6. August 2013, 23:46:08 schrieb Jeroen Roovers: |
4 |
> >> 23:37:25 <willikins> rej, you have notes! [21:13] <mrueg> Let me |
5 |
> >> rephrase this: Just a friendly notice to please refrain from rephrasing |
6 |
> >> bug summaries from "Stabilize ${P}" to "${P} stable req". This just |
7 |
> >> adds unneeded noise to the bug. I don't want this on bugs I've reported |
8 |
> >> or am assigned to. |
9 |
> >> |
10 |
> > |
11 |
> > Jer, |
12 |
> > |
13 |
> > please stop making whitespace noise on bugs that you have absolutely no |
14 |
> > relation to. It just causes unnecessary bugmail. If maintainers care they |
15 |
> > will change it themselves. |
16 |
> > |
17 |
> > Cheers, |
18 |
> > Andreas |
19 |
> |
20 |
[...] |
21 |
> |
22 |
> Not so hypothetical situation: someone files a bug: "Fancy KDE mail |
23 |
> program fails with my gcc", you fix it and live happily ever after. |
24 |
> How on earth am I supposed to find it when porting/stabilizing newer |
25 |
> version of gcc? |
26 |
> I expect (as many others) something similar to "=kde-base/kmail-4.8.10 |
27 |
> fails to build with gcc-4.8" |
28 |
> |
29 |
> I deeply respect the work of people who fix bugzilla subjects to conform |
30 |
> to "atom: issue" format. It saves me a great deal of time. |
31 |
|
32 |
That's fine, bug wranglers are doing a great job there. |
33 |
|
34 |
However, I'm also sick of getting bugmail because $RANDOM_DEV thinks |
35 |
* TRACKER is better than Tracker, |
36 |
* every atom needs a "=" in front, and |
37 |
* "Please stabilize XXX" should always be replaced by "XXX stabilization". |
38 |
|
39 |
Remeber, I've been talking about effective whitespace noise. |
40 |
|
41 |
-- |
42 |
Andreas K. Huettel |
43 |
Gentoo Linux developer (council, kde) |
44 |
dilfridge@g.o |
45 |
http://www.akhuettel.de/ |